Hi Sergey, we don’t use HW VTEP with any type of NAT — only L3 routing, so I didn’t test it. At which point does the drop occur? BTW, what type of HW and SW you run as a VTEP switch?
Regards, Vladislav Odintsov > On 18 Jul 2022, at 03:22, Sergey <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hello, Numan! > > Thank you for the information! > I've just finished tests, routing and SNAT work great in my case with this > patch. > But floating IPs do not, I am continuing to research this case... > > Vladislav, maybe you tried floating IP? > > Thanks > Sergei > > пн, 20 июн. 2022 г. в 20:24, Numan Siddique <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>>: > On Mon, Jun 20, 2022 at 6:18 PM Sergey <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > > > Hello! > > > > We use VTEP gateway to extend OVN Geneve network to VXLAN on physical > > switches. > > It works great, VMs and baremetals and physical routers see each other. > > > > But when you create a Logical Router in OVN and try to use it from > > baremetals or physical routers - there is a problem. > > It is unreachable. > > > > So I have a question, maybe there is some solution to solve it? Something > > similar to "Native OVN services for external logical ports"... > > > > If there is no such solution is it a good idea to solve it by implementing > > a few OVS rules to solve it? > > Does this commit address your usecase - > https://github.com/ovn-org/ovn/commit/4e90bcf55c2ef1ab9940836455e4bfe36e57f307 > > <https://github.com/ovn-org/ovn/commit/4e90bcf55c2ef1ab9940836455e4bfe36e57f307> > ? > > +Vladislav Odintsov Maybe he has some comments for this use case. > > Thanks > Numan > > > _______________________________________________ > > discuss mailing list > > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > > https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-discuss > > <https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-discuss>
_______________________________________________ discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-discuss
