Having always up to date packages in the core repositories is ideal, but there 
are a couple of reasons I suggested separate yum repositories/PPAs.

1. Getting constant attention for the package from the package maintainer is a 
wildcard, and even if it happens now, you never know what it will be like in 
the future.
2. More importantly: Redhat does not release package version updates as part of 
its update process; they back port patches into the repository’s current 
version.  While that may work from a functionality standpoint (if new features 
made it into the backports), there could be things in ModSecurity that rely on 
the version number being correct.  While Redhat/CentOS may be unlike other 
distros in this respect, its use is very widespread.

I certainly wouldn’t oppose up to date packages in core repositories, if the 
ModSecurity team decides to pursue this, but the logistics will need careful 
consideration.

Thanks,

Jeremy Brown

From: bpkr...@gmail.com [mailto:bpkr...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Sunday, August 12, 2012 7:25 PM
To: Jeremy Brown; Ryan Barnett; mod-security-us...@lists.sourceforge.net; 
owasp-modsecurity-core-rule-set@lists.owasp.org
Subject: Re: [Owasp-modsecurity-core-rule-set] Using the latest ModSecurity 
Versions

I'm not sure I totally agree. I like not having endless extra repos to track 
and the vetting process that Debian for one has on their stable, backports, and 
volatile branches (though its not called that anymore). 

It might just be a matter of working a bit more closely with them. 

Thanks, 
Brian

Sent from my mobile device. 

----- Reply message -----
From: "Jeremy Brown" <jerem...@infosend.com>
Date: Fri, Aug 10, 2012 10:01
Subject: [Owasp-modsecurity-core-rule-set] Using the latest ModSecurity Versions
To: "Ryan Barnett" <rbarn...@trustwave.com>, 
"mod-security-us...@lists.sourceforge.net" 
<mod-security-us...@lists.sourceforge.net>, 
"owasp-modsecurity-core-rule-set@lists.owasp.org" 
<owasp-modsecurity-core-rule-set@lists.owasp.org>

Hi Ryan,

+1 to the repo idea.  ModSecurity is the only software I maintain from source, 
because I fight to keep everything else installed from a repo.

I would humbly suggest the ModSecurity team consider running their own yum 
repository and Debian/Ubuntu PPA.  I think it would definitely help keep people 
up to to date, and you wouldn't have to rely on upstream maintainers.

Thanks,

Jeremy Brown

===========================================

From: owasp-modsecurity-core-rule-set-boun...@lists.owasp.org 
[mailto:owasp-modsecurity-core-rule-set-boun...@lists.owasp.org] On Behalf Of 
Ryan Barnett
Sent: Friday, August 10, 2012 6:38 AM
To: mod-security-us...@lists.sourceforge.net; 
owasp-modsecurity-core-rule-set@lists.owasp.org
Subject: [Owasp-modsecurity-core-rule-set] Using the latest ModSecurity Versions

Question for the lists - if you are not running the latest version of ModSecurit
_______________________________________________
Owasp-modsecurity-core-rule-set mailing list
Owasp-modsecurity-core-rule-set@lists.owasp.org
https://lists.owasp.org/mailman/listinfo/owasp-modsecurity-core-rule-set

Reply via email to