Chaim, On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 01:06:20PM +0000, Chaim Sanders wrote: > already put off by the complexity of ModSecurity. Although you bring up > many good points in your email, I still think that based off of my > experiences it makes more sense to call it aggressiveness, especially now > that we have multiple levels. Great email btw Christian.
Thanks for the flowers. Took me a while to assemble it. ;) I agree with you, that paranoia may sound difficult, but I am sure we can get the point across, that the default is _less_ paranoid/aggressive than it used to me thanks to exile of the paranoid rules into the higher and non-standard paranoia settings. Now how do we proceed? It seems I was able to convince most other participants in this conversation outside you. You are in charge, so I have no problem with you making the decision. But a decision we need. My pull request #1 is ready. I can submit it as is, or I do s/paranoia/aggressiveness/. Your call. Ahoj, Christian -- Our sense of responsibility is not always as well developed as our sense of righteousness. --- Mark Burgess, Principles of Network and System Administration _______________________________________________ Owasp-modsecurity-core-rule-set mailing list Owasp-modsecurity-core-rule-set@lists.owasp.org https://lists.owasp.org/mailman/listinfo/owasp-modsecurity-core-rule-set
