Good morning Noël, On Sun, Mar 06, 2016 at 09:29:23AM +0100, Noël Zindel wrote: > I probably missed this information somewhen during our conversation.
It was more implicit, I guess. > Two things. Do we have a paranoia-level assignment for each candidate? I think we should start with paranoia level 20. If somebody sees good reasons for an individual rule getting an even higher setting, then it's a separate discussion and get done any time. > And what about the rule IDs for rules that were initially dropped but > later assigned to paranoia mode? Technically, this is going to be pull request #3, is not it? I'd like to keep this separate from #2. But then, I think we should just move the formerly dropped 2.2.X rules into the respective files and continue with the numbers in steps of 10 of the individual files. It is important to add them to https://github.com/SpiderLabs/owasp-modsecurity-crs/tree/v3.0.0-rc1/id_renumbering as well. Ahoj, Christian P.S. You quote a private paranoia-level message in your mailinglist message without making this clear (-> this could puzzle people who did not get that message). And some people do not like their private messages shared on mailinglists without asking first. No hard feelings from my side. Just saying. -- History repeats itself, first as tragedy, second as XML. --- Comment found on slashdot
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Owasp-modsecurity-core-rule-set mailing list Owasp-modsecurity-core-rule-set@lists.owasp.org https://lists.owasp.org/mailman/listinfo/owasp-modsecurity-core-rule-set
