Hi,

after a few weeks with ModSec, CRS3, some custom rules and several
exepction rules, things seems to run smoothly now.

@Christian: With help of your tutorials, I was able to solve some other
issues. Thanks for that!

Regards,

Heinrich


Am Donnerstag, den 24.11.2016, 07:46 +0100 schrieb Heinrich M.:
> Hi Christian,
> 
> thank you for the information and the grep command :-). 
> 
> After dealing with some other problems the last days, I'm back to
> ModSec today. I will report everything I encounter.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Heinrich
> 
> P.S. Going to switch to 3.0/dev for further testing.
> 
> 
> Am Freitag, den 18.11.2016, 16:06 +0100 schrieb Christian Folini:
> > 
> > Hello Heinrich,
> > 
> > Another well spotted bug. Thank you. It's funny how a new pair of
> > eyes
> > spots bugs in corners ignored by experienced users.
> > 
> > The support for the "ver" action is only partial. In fact there are
> > more than only the blocking rules that come without the "ver"
> > action.
> > 
> > I have opened a bug report for this issue:
> > https://github.com/SpiderLabs/owasp-modsecurity-crs/issues/650
> > 
> > I flagged it for CRS 3.1.0. There is a chance, this will be made
> > available for 3.0.1, but I doubt it as it's quite a bit of work
> > and not crucial for the correct functioning of the rule set.
> > 
> > In your situation, you are best off with the following construct
> > including the mandaory regular expression : Note how the CRS rules
> > are all in the 900K range, but we lately claimed the 9M range too;
> > hence {5,6}.
> > 
> > $> cat error.log | egrep "id \"9[0-9]{5,6}\""
> > 
> > Keep these bug reports coming, please.
> > 
> > Best,
> > 
> > Christian
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 02:27:14PM +0100, Heinrich M. wrote:
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Hi,
> > > 
> > > while playing around with the rule set and adding some custom
> > > rules, I
> > > found that the blocking rules miss the version tag within
> > > Apache's
> > > error log. Is there a reason for this? As fas as I could see,
> > > every
> > > other rule is tagged with [ver "OWASP_CRS/3.0.0"] but I may be
> > > missing
> > > something. 
> > > 
> > > I'd like to grep for '[ver "OWASP_CRS/3.0.0"]' in order to
> > > separate
> > > log
> > > entries from custom rules from the CRS rules. I know that this
> > > can
> > > also
> > > be done by rule IDs but those regexes are hard ;-).
> > > 
> > > Regards,
> > > 
> > > Heinrich
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Owasp-modsecurity-core-rule-set mailing list
> > > Owasp-modsecurity-core-rule-set@lists.owasp.org
> > > https://lists.owasp.org/mailman/listinfo/owasp-modsecurity-core-r
> > > ul
> > > e-set
> _______________________________________________
> Owasp-modsecurity-core-rule-set mailing list
> Owasp-modsecurity-core-rule-set@lists.owasp.org
> https://lists.owasp.org/mailman/listinfo/owasp-modsecurity-core-rule-
> set
_______________________________________________
Owasp-modsecurity-core-rule-set mailing list
Owasp-modsecurity-core-rule-set@lists.owasp.org
https://lists.owasp.org/mailman/listinfo/owasp-modsecurity-core-rule-set

Reply via email to