Sounds acceptable
On Sep 29, 2005, at 4:17 PM, David Lissiuk wrote:
Hi Gus,
Everyone is invited of course, but really after those willing to
spend
some time on it to make it happen, and just want it clear to leave
company
biases and agendas at the door. I'd like to make everything public
but not
sure it would be a good idea to force any derivative work to be
public. For
instance a company that spends a lot of time generating code/hardware to
control motors may not wish to share with the general public the
details for
commercial reasons, (though it would be nice). But if we can offer
them and
everyone else a standard and reasons, for using this interface, that
would
be at least a move in the right direction. Designs done by the working
group members on this would be public, though not posted till something
reasonable is formed to avoid people going off in different
directions. And
would like to keep original conversations private so people are free to
suggest anything and not have to worry about repercussions to start
with and
things can move faster.. As soon as their's a straw-man it would be
published so the rough edges could be knocked off by everyone.
Cheers, Dave
David Lissiuk
Sr. Computer Scientist
Springbok DIgitronics
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Power Architecture Resource Center: Free content, downloads,
discussions,
and more. http://solutions.newsforge.com/ibmarch.tmpl
_______________________________________________
Owfs-developers mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/owfs-developers
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Power Architecture Resource Center: Free content, downloads, discussions,
and more. http://solutions.newsforge.com/ibmarch.tmpl
_______________________________________________
Owfs-developers mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/owfs-developers
