On Tue, 2005-10-18 at 10:28 -0400, Geo Carncross wrote: > All of which makes exposing the synchronization primitives used by OW > pretty much worthless.
I should clarify, that providing a common API to the language bindings isn't bad, but requiring that they use them is- that is, having other parts of OW use the same mutexes and locks and whathaveyou that the OW language bindings do. -- Internet Connection High Quality Web Hosting http://www.internetconnection.net/ ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Power Architecture Resource Center: Free content, downloads, discussions, and more. http://solutions.newsforge.com/ibmarch.tmpl _______________________________________________ Owfs-developers mailing list Owfs-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/owfs-developers