On Tue, 2005-10-18 at 10:28 -0400, Geo Carncross wrote:
> All of which makes exposing the synchronization primitives used by OW
> pretty much worthless.

I should clarify, that providing a common API to the language bindings
isn't bad, but requiring that they use them is- that is, having other
parts of OW use the same mutexes and locks and whathaveyou that the OW
language bindings do.

-- 
Internet Connection High Quality Web Hosting
http://www.internetconnection.net/



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Power Architecture Resource Center: Free content, downloads, discussions,
and more. http://solutions.newsforge.com/ibmarch.tmpl
_______________________________________________
Owfs-developers mailing list
Owfs-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/owfs-developers

Reply via email to