Christian, 

  I guess I successfully design the DS9097-equivalent circuit for serial
interface (no error showing "Could not detect DS9097").

  Now, when I ran "owfs --foreground --error_level 9 /dev/ttyS0
/mnt/1wire/": it shows

 ---------------------
CONNECT: fuse mount point: /mnt/1wire/
   CALL: PARSENAME path=[]
CONNECT: Cannot detect DS2480 or LINK interface on /dev/ttyS0.
  DEBUG: COM_close: flush
  DEBUG: COM_close: restore
  DEBUG: COM_close: close
   CALL: PARSENAME path=[]
  DEBUG: fuse_mnt_opt=[(null)]
  DEBUG: fuse_open_opt=[(null)]
unique: 1, opcode: INIT (26), nodeid: 0, insize: 56
INIT: 7.7
flags=0x00000003
max_readahead=0x00020000
   INIT: 7.8
   flags=0x00000001
   max_readahead=0x00020000
   max_write=0x00020000
   unique: 1, error: 0 (Success), outsize: 40
 ---------------------

 It seems owfs could not detect DS2781K sensor chip ("CONNECT: Cannot detect
DS2480 or LINK interface on /dev/ttyS0.") that I am using. So, even if
/dev/ttyS0 mounts successfully, I can not pull out any info, like voltage,
current, etc. from mounted directory.

 Any suggestion will be helpful.

 Thanks.



------

Christian Magnusson-2 wrote:
> 
> The original schema looks like this. 
> 
> DTR ---------------------
> 
> GND -------------------- schottky diods, resistance and zener diods.
> 
> RXD ---------------------
> 
> TXD ---------------------
> 
>  
> 
> But if you are going to replace DTR with Vcc, I think you should add an
> extra resistance just after Vcc.
> 
>   Otherwise you might break your router if you short Vcc with GND. (+
> there
> will be some mA through the 3.9V zener which requires the resistance to
> avoid short-circuit).
> 
> Vcc ----100ohm--------
> 
> GND -------------------- + original schema..
> 
> RXD ---------------------
> 
> TXD ---------------------
> 
>  
> 
> I don't think you wrote this in your reply. Does anyone else agree with
> this?
> 
>  
> 
> /Christian
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of suman
> sarkar
> Sent: den 13 september 2007 02:28
> To: owfs-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: [Owfs-developers] Re :Re: Re :Re: Re :Re: MIPS vs MIPSEL in OWFS
> 
>  
> 
> 
>  OK, Christian ... first of all, thanks for your valuable input. 
> 
>  If I understand it correctly, only 4 pins (2,3,4,5) of standard DB-9 are
> used to build an equivalent DS9097 circuit for 1-wire chips, of which DTR
> (pin 4) connects to 1-wire Data (probably DQ for Maxim 1-wire chip), and
> RXD
> (pin 2) connects to 1-wire GND (probably P- for Maxim 1-wire chip).
> 
>  So, with those diodes and resistors in the picture (protection circuit
> for
> the 1-wire chip), I've decided to build my own little circuit for 4-pin
> for
> my board (and not using off-the-shelf 9-pin DS9097).
> 
>  Conceptually it should work (help me if I am missing anything): DTR (of
> DB9) is equivalent to Vcc (my board), RX and TX (of DB9) are equivalent to
> TX and RX (my board), respectively, and GND to GND, of course with an
> equivalent protection circuit, as shown in the picture.
> 
>  With this (1-wire chip with my own circuit for 4-pin serial above, which
> I
> presume will be equivalent to DS9097), I guess owfs would be able to see
> and
> mount the /dev/ttyS0, and would  NOT complain: "Could not detect DS9097".
> 
>  Any input from you will be useful before I jump into it.
> 
>  Another question: what about the other pins of DB9 as shown in the
> picture?
> Are they left open, especially handshaking pins like RTS/CTS (pin 7/8)?
> 
>  Thanks.
> 
> ----
> On Wed, 12 Sep 2007 20:16:55 +0200 owfs-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
> wrote
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Shouldn't you be able to use Maxim's reference
> 
> design of a passive 9097 adapter?
> 
> 
> 
> DTR is there to supply 1-wire bus with power since it's
> 
> high when serial-port is opened. This could be replaced with Vcc I think.
> Perhaps
> 
> an extra 100ohm (just after Vcc) to protect it from short-circuit  would
> 
> be good too. The DTR pin is probably short-protected on all
> serial-interfaces,
> 
> but Vcc on your board is probably not. 
> 
> 
> 
>  
> 
> 
> 
> Look at the drawing at:
> 
> 
> 
> http://owfs.sourceforge.net/adapters.html#Serial
> 
> 
> 
> Picture: http://owfs.sourceforge.net/adapters/adapter.gif
> 
> 
> 
>  
> 
> 
> 
> /Christian
> 
> 
> 
>  
> 
> 
> 
>  
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> From:
> 
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of suman
> 
> sarkar
> 
> 
> 
> Sent: den 12 september 2007 01:59
> 
> 
> 
> To: owfs-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
> 
> 
> 
> Subject: [Owfs-developers] Re :Re: Re :Re: MIPS vs MIPSEL in OWFS
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>  
> 
> 
> 
>  Hi
> 
> Christian,
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>  Here are some clarifications re: Meraki AP's serial interface.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>  This interface is NOT a regular 9-pin interface (DB9) as you see in
> 
> WRT54G. It has only 4 pins: Vcc, Tx, Rx, and GND.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>  OWFS can only support DS9097 serial adapter, I presume, which has a
> 
> regular 9-pin serial configuration.
> 
> 
> 
>  
> 
> 
> 
>  So, any Maxim sensor chip (which is DS2781K in our case), with DS9097
> 
> serial adapter CAN NOT be directly fed to the AP's 4-pin interface. It
> needs
> 
> some tweaking, I guess.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>  Any suggestion regarding how to make it compatible with a 4-pin
> 
> interface?
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>  Thanks.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>  
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>  
> <http://adworks.rediff.com/cgi-bin/AdWorks/click.cgi/www.rediff.com/signatur
> e-home.htm/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/1436607_1430041/1436126/1?PARTNER=3&OAS_QUERY=
> null%20target=new%20> cashback_rediff_signatureli_578x38
> 
>  
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
> _______________________________________________
> Owfs-developers mailing list
> Owfs-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/owfs-developers
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/Re-%3ARe%3A-Re-%3ARe%3A-Re-%3ARe%3A-MIPS-vs-MIPSEL-in-OWFS-tf4432813.html#a12666589
Sent from the OWFS - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
Owfs-developers mailing list
Owfs-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/owfs-developers

Reply via email to