My first test: 24 hours of a 10 second loop of directory reads (50 devices, USB adapter, owserver/owdir) showed essentially no memory loss (4K difference between the start and end). I'll test reads and writes as well. Then the specific owfs program.
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 12:05 PM, David Schumacher <davids...@web.de> wrote: > after some days of regulating temperature via owperl (about 1 switch per 10 > seconds, so the process has not grown very much) pmap says: > > > by the way: owperl had no problem at all, while owserver and owfs lost the > sensors and made controlling and reading impossible every some minutes. > all programs are working without problems with the passive adapter (but > slow...). They use essentially the same code: libow. Is you perl script a loop, or is it starting up owperl repeatedly? > the increasing memory-consumption seems to be the same with all programs. > its about 4k per 10 switcvhes or something like that. > > i will now start a high-frequency-switchingloop while monitoring with pmap. > do you hve any preferences about the program (owperl, owserver, owfs...) i > should use for the test? > > thanx! > david > >
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________ Owfs-developers mailing list Owfs-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/owfs-developers
