I found at least one bug with /alarm thanks to your report (the -uscan creates a bus entry that can't really support an alarm). It will be corrected in the next release. (It's in the CVS version).
The system is now robust for me, but I'll look forward to your testing. Paul Alfille On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 1:58 PM, Michael Markstaller <[email protected]> wrote: > ..also tried to track down the second problem with 2.8p0 a little further: > > --- cut --- > ... > DEBUG: handler.c:Handler(137) OWSERVER handler done > DEBUG: ow_net_server.c:ProcessAcceptSocket(240) Normal exit. > owserver: tpp.c:66: __pthread_tpp_change_priority: Assertion `previous_prio > == -1 || (previous_prio >= __sched_fifo_min_prio && previous_prio <= > __sched_fifo_max_prio)' failed. > --- cut --- > > Happens at different times&places, but quite reproduceable with (just a > random test case): > while [ 1 ]; do owread /bus.2/interface/statistics/errors; owread > /28.28520E020000/temperature10; owget /28.3F71EC010000/fasttemp; done; > > A complete smaller log is attached.. > > > best regards > > Michael > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > This SF.net email is sponsored by > > Make an app they can't live without > Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge > http://p.sf.net/sfu/RIM-dev2dev > _______________________________________________ > Owfs-developers mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/owfs-developers > >
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by Make an app they can't live without Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge http://p.sf.net/sfu/RIM-dev2dev
_______________________________________________ Owfs-developers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/owfs-developers
