Hi,

I finished the transition from using owfs vs. directly interfacing 
owserver over the network. I have been running my setup for over 4 weeks 
with rather heavy loads (1 Hz read/write activity on 26 1-wire devices) 
and feel that some preliminary conclusions can be drawn.

- This setup seems much more stable compared to the owfs based setup. I 
have not seen a single read/write failure over the 4-week period
- The client is written in a way that it simply retransmits the request 
to owserver upon i.) error returned or ii.) lack of response whithin 6 
seconds, hence is not subject to file handling exceptions. If the latter 
occurs it stops/starts the owserver, which is eventually encapsulated 
into a system service
- Although it is more stable by design the bottomline is that I have 
seen neither errors occuring during the 3-week period, which normally 
happened with the owfs approach

The conclusion is that I do not recommend the owfs approach for heavy 
applications. It has many layers where the root cause could be including 
fuse itself or the owfs specific code and appears so seldom that is very 
hard to debug.

Doma


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Download new Adobe(R) Flash(R) Builder(TM) 4
The new Adobe(R) Flex(R) 4 and Flash(R) Builder(TM) 4 (formerly 
Flex(R) Builder(TM)) enable the development of rich applications that run
across multiple browsers and platforms. Download your free trials today!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/adobe-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
Owfs-developers mailing list
Owfs-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/owfs-developers

Reply via email to