Hello everybody,
I'm new to this forum and shortly want to introduce myself:
During my tests with 1-Wire for a hot-water controller, I used the Maxim
Public Domain Kit. But due to some limitations I try to switch to owfs now.
My biggest fear at owfs is a low performance causing high load at my CPU
which is with 400MHz and ARM9 very limited... I'm using an hardware I2C
channel /dev/i2c-0 with DS2482-100. The aim is to have a closed loop
controlling rate of max 250ms for 4 DS18B20 temp sensing plus DS2408 dac. So
therefore my (newbie) questions:

The convenience of all the different owfs client technologies is great
(thanks to the developers for this amazing piece of code!!!), assuming there
is not much difference in adapting my C-coded application. Which one of the
following give the fastest access, creating the minimum CPU load:

- owfs, accessing files in directories via fuse
- owshell, calling shell commands via local owserver
- owserver, adding code to my C-application acting as TCP client

Or maybe it is not worth a discussion and all mentioned possibilities have
almost the same speed/load?

Another questions:
Does using alias slowing down the access??

thanks a lot
  Achim
-- 
View this message in context: 
http://old.nabble.com/different-access-performance-tp32230443p32230443.html
Sent from the OWFS - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
uberSVN's rich system and user administration capabilities and model 
configuration take the hassle out of deploying and managing Subversion and 
the tools developers use with it. Learn more about uberSVN and get a free 
download at:  http://p.sf.net/sfu/wandisco-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
Owfs-developers mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/owfs-developers

Reply via email to