Thanks! Super-helpful. Colin
On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 12:15 PM, Jan Kandziora <j...@gmx.de> wrote: > Am 14.10.2015 um 03:34 schrieb Colin Reese: > > > > I was in the process of updating libraries with new device and had a few > > questions: > > > > 1. Is there a more updated device list than Maxim's here: > > > > https://www.maximintegrated.com/en/app-notes/index.mvp/id/155 > > > I don't think so. Though Maxim's list isn't complete as it doesn't has > the third-party family codes in it. And the special DS2401 in the > DS9490U host adaptors is also missing and so on. > > > > > > > 2. Why are devices DS1982, DS1985 and DS1986 listed as 09, 0B and 0F in > > the Maxim list, but get special treatment as "U" devices in the owfs > > list as 89, 8B, and ? Looking at the datasheets for the devices does > > seem to indicate that they do indeed have the family codes 89, 8B, and > 8F. > > > Maxim decided to add that U to the name. The DS1982 has family code 09. > Our own list is a bit imcomplete as it only lists the chip-packaged > versions of that device, which are named DS2502. The can-packaged > version is named DS1982. See page 2 of the datasheet. > > http://datasheets.maximintegrated.com/en/ds/DS2502.pdf > http://datasheets.maximintegrated.com/en/ds/DS1982.pdf > > > The DS1982U has family code 89. Other that that, it is functional > identical to the 09 devices. See page 3. > > http://datasheets.maximintegrated.com/en/ds/DS1982U-DS1985U.pdf > > > Same for the other uniqueware chips. > > > > > 3. Why is DS2407 omitted as an x12 device? > > > OWFS never supported the special functions of the DS2407 because it was > obsolete and widely unavailable even at the time the owfs project > started. Paul haven't got the chance to get a single test sample, IIRC. > > http://pdfserv.maximintegrated.com/en/ds/DS2407.pdf > > Leaving out these functions, the DS2407 is just the same as the DS2406. > > > > > 4. Finally, and most important, why is DS1922 listed as family 22? This > > is incorrect. It shows up as family 41, same as DS1923. > > > That's a bug in our table. It has to read DS1822, not DS1922. > > > And no, I don't have access to the owfs.org website. > > Kind regards > > Jan > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > _______________________________________________ > Owfs-developers mailing list > Owfs-developers@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/owfs-developers >
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________ Owfs-developers mailing list Owfs-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/owfs-developers
