I can see no reason for not using moat, aside from differences in failure state, if any.
C > On Dec 29, 2015, at 10:43 AM, Jan Kandziora <j...@gmx.de> wrote: > >> Am 29.12.2015 um 16:39 schrieb Ursin Soler: >> >> By this year (initial release 7/15) Maxim released the DS28E17 [1] >> which is in my oppinion a game changer. > I like to add, the DS28E17 is only available in a very tiny 16TQFN-EP > package, which is very hard to solder by hand (0.5mm pitch, no leads) so > I doubt anyone of us hobbyists is going to use that chip unless someone > sells it on a pinned 2.54mm pitch adapter board. > > For me, I'd rather use Pascal Berten's BAE0911, which has I²C bridging > functionality, and implement the neccesary logic with the chip's > automation engine. Or do the same with Matthias' MOAT, I could use an > arbitrary Atmel AVR chip then. > > Kind regards > > Jan > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > _______________________________________________ > Owfs-developers mailing list > Owfs-developers@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/owfs-developers ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Owfs-developers mailing list Owfs-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/owfs-developers
