On 10/09/16 14:23, Colin Law wrote: > On 10 September 2016 at 13:02, Jan Kandziora <j...@gmx.de> wrote: >> Am 10.09.2016 um 11:22 schrieb Colin Law: >>> Is there really a need for two? Why >>> not just have everything in one? >>> >> Because of access rights. GitHub only allows full developer access to >> anything or no rights at all. Not Wiki-alone. > I believe that is not correct. > https://help.github.com/articles/changing-access-permissions-for-wikis/ The settings page only allows you to enable/disable wiki, and to optionally "Restrict editing to users in teams with push access only.". So either anyone with a Github Account can edit, or only users with push access.
However, as Jan said, we could just use a separate owfs-doc repo with a publicly editable wiki. This is of course if we're comfortable with anyone editing all of the docs, and not really have a distinction between "official docs" and contributed articles. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Owfs-developers mailing list Owfs-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/owfs-developers
