Sven, what code are you using on your attiny?

> On Feb 15, 2017, at 7:27 AM, Jan Kandziora <j...@gmx.de> wrote:
> 
>> Am 15.02.2017 um 08:25 schrieb Sven Giermann:
>> 
>> I have several temperature sensors and 1 DS2423 counter in one room. All
>> are connected with a Cat.5 network cable (about 30 meters) in a single bus
>> that ends in another room with a small embedded Debian ARM (armel) server
>> that runs OWFS 2.8p15-1.
>> 
> Please update to 3.1p5. No one wants to hunt bugs fixed for years.
> 
> 
>> Everything fine up to here. Let's call this branch "A".
>> 
>> I then started to connect some software programmed ATTiny85 custom 1-wire
>> slaves, drawing another branch (branch "B") from my server. That way, the
>> first star-alike topology was built, currently a single bus, but with the
>> master in the middle.
>> This also worked for the first 2 devices, about 7 meters distance to the
>> master (remember the additional 30 m to the other sensors). I used simple
>> electric cable (NYM-J 3x1.5mm²) for this second branch, because I needed
>> the third wire for some higher currents.
>> 
> I would suspect the ATtiny slaves are a more picky about the timing then
> the Dallas/Maxim ones.
> 
> 
>> Well... some months later I added 2 more custom slaves on a third branch
>> ("C"), having a typical star topology now with the master in the middle.
>> Again, those are connected with NYM-J as well, with about 4 meters distance
>> and..... yes, it worked!
>> 
>> My problems started when I expanded the last branch by another 4 meters
>> trying to connect a third slave on that branch!
>> Suddenly all 3 slaves on that branch disappeared from the bus.
>> 
> Yes. That could happen and it is likely to happen. The star topology is bad.
> 
> 
>> I could not get them back, whatever I tried: removing the 4 meters
>> extension, disconnecting the other 2 branches, only connect a single slave
>> - nothing helped.
>> (But they showed up and worked for weeks before I added the extension!)
>> 
>> I then finished my setup first - having a total of 3 slaves on branch "B"
>> and 7 slaves on branch "C". Branch "B" has a total length of 12 meters,
>> branch "C" about 30 meters:
>> 
>> Master (DS9490R)
>> |--()--()--...--()   "A", 30 meters Cat.5, 8 slaves
>> |--()--()--()        "B", 12 meters NYM-J1.5, 3 slaves
>> |--()--()--...--()   "C", 30 meters NYM-J1.5, 7 slaves
>> 
>> Still, only all slaves of branch "A" and the the first two of branch "B"
>> show up on the bus. For testing purpose I went and connected my laptop
>> running a virtualized Debian installation and OWFS to that bus - and: ALL
>> devices showed up and responded to read and write commands. It took some
>> seconds and maybe 3-4 runs of 'owdir /uncached' to see all devices, but
>> finally it worked.
>> 
> No, it didn't. What you have is an extremely brittle setup which may or
> may not work, depending on moon phase and other non-insightful
> parameters. This is impossible to debug.
> 
> 
>> 
>> Now... does anyone have any advice what to change/try next?
>> Should I try to compile OWFS 3.1?
>> 
> You should install the Rasbian package from the testing repository.
> 
> Testing(Stretch) has owfs-3.1p5. You can use the owfs packages
> from the Raspbian testing repository. Edit (or create) your
> /etc/apt/preferences to contain:
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Package: *
> Pin: release o=Raspbian,a=stable
> Pin-Priority: 500
> 
> Package: *
> Pin: release o=Raspbian,a=testing
> Pin-Priority: 300
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This is important so you keep stable (Jessie) for all packages but the ones
> explicitly taken from testing (Stretch).
> 
> 
> Then, add a line
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> deb http://mirrordirector.raspbian.org/raspbian/ testing main contrib
> non-free rpi
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> to your /etc/apt/sources.list to get access to the Raspbian testing
> repository.
> 
> Do an
> 
> $ sudo apt-get update
> 
> to read the package metadata, then check
> 
> $ sudo apt-cache policy
> 
> whether the testing repo is there with priority 300. Then
> 
> $ sudo apt-get update -t testing owserver ow-shell
> 
> That should install all you need, including the startup files and
> systemd units.
> Note you have to edit /etc/owfs.conf again to contain (this and only this)
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> !server: server = localhost:4304
> server: w1
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Restart the owserver service after that.
> 
> 
>> Is there any configuration (defines?) that can cause different timing on
>> the bus - making it work on i386 and fail on armel?
>> 
> Do you use the DS9490 on both?
> 
> 
>> Any advise to change the bus? Different cable? Different master (I have
>> another LinkUSB)?
>> Again: I already disconnected branches "A" and "B" resulting in no slaves
>> at all - with a single bus/branch.
>> 
>> Hope somebody can help me out...
>> 
> First, get rid of the star topology. Make a lobe with the help of the
> additional wires in the Cat.5 cable. Replace the 12m NYM-J1.5 stub by
> another lobe cable with at least 4 wires. Connect your 30m NYM-J1.5 stub
> to the far end of that lobe.
> 
> If you can't do that or don't want to do that, use multiple host
> adaptors or a host adaptor with built-in switch e.g. the DS2482-800. Or
> try to get two DS2409 switches.
> 
> Kind regards
> 
>    Jan
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
> engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
> _______________________________________________
> Owfs-developers mailing list
> Owfs-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/owfs-developers

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Owfs-developers mailing list
Owfs-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/owfs-developers

Reply via email to