Hello Fumi,
I just tried with the latest release (OWLIM-SE 4.3.4238) and I can't
reproduce this problem using these steps:
PREFIX rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#>
PREFIX ex: <http://example.org#>
INSERT DATA {
ex:東京 rdfs:label "Tokyo" .
}
PREFIX rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#>
PREFIX ex: <http://example.org#>
SELECT * {
?s rdfs:label "Tokyo" .
}
=> Returns ?s=ex:東京
PREFIX rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#>
PREFIX ex: <http://example.org#>
SELECT * {
ex:東京 rdfs:label ?o .
}
=> returns ?o="Tokyo"
PREFIX rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#>
PREFIX ex: <http://example.org#>
SELECT * {
ex:東京 ?p ?o .
}
=> Returns both bindings as expected
Which version of OWLIM are you using?
Best,
barry
--
Barry Bishop
OWLIM Product Manager
Ontotext AD
Tel: +43 650 2000 237
email: [email protected]
www.ontotext.com
On 05/12/11 10:45, Nikolay Krustev wrote:
Hello Fumi,
Thank you for your question.
One of our Core Team devs will look into this issue and send feedback.
Regards,
Nikolay
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Fumihiro Kato
Sent: Monday, December 05, 2011 9:02 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [Owlim-discussion] An IRI issue in SPARQL
Hello all,
I have been trying to use IRIs with OWLIM-SE, it seems that a
SPARQL query does not match any IRIs including unicode characters.
For instance, I have uploaded the following simple turtle into an OWLIM
repository.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
@prefix rdfs:<http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
<http://example.org/東京> rdfs:label "Tokyo" .
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Then the repository does not return any result when I send the
following SPARQL query to it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SELECT *
WHERE {
<http://example.org/東京> ?p ?o .
}
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I thought that this was one of Sesame's issues at first. However,
I confirmed a sesame memory repository accepted the query
and returned a proper result. Therefore I guess this problem is
in OWLIM.
Any clues?
Fumi
_______________________________________________
OWLIM-discussion mailing list
[email protected]
http://ontotext.com/mailman/listinfo/owlim-discussion
_______________________________________________
OWLIM-discussion mailing list
[email protected]
http://ontotext.com/mailman/listinfo/owlim-discussion
_______________________________________________
OWLIM-discussion mailing list
[email protected]
http://ontotext.com/mailman/listinfo/owlim-discussion
