Hello Pavel,
Can you provide some more details, please?
Do you mean that you see the expected variable names when calling
TupleQueryResult.getBindingNames(), but that calls to
TupleQueryResult.next().getBindingNames() do not have the expected
variable names? Is this true for every BindingSet?
Best
barry
Barry Bishop
OWLIM Product Manager
Ontotext AD
Tel: +43 650 2000 237
email: [email protected]
skype: bazbishop
www.ontotext.com
On 12/09/12 10:47, Pavel Mička wrote:
Hi,
I am using OWLIM-Lite edition (5.2.5331, Sesame 2.6.8) and I am
querying the system using the following SPARQL query:
PREFIX owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#>
PREFIX rdf: <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#>
PREFIX rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#>
PREFIX odra: <http://kbss.felk.cvut.cz/ontologies/2012/OdraOntology.owl/>
SELECT ?type (COUNT(DISTINCT ?instance) AS ?count) WHERE {
?instance odra:hasType ?type .
}
GROUP BY ?type
In BindingSet I expect 2 bindings (type, count), however the result
contains only count. But the TupleQueryResult contains (correctly)
both of them.
Am I missing something or is this a bug?
Thanks
Pavel Mička
_______________________________________________
Owlim-discussion mailing list
[email protected]
http://ontomail.semdata.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/owlim-discussion
_______________________________________________
Owlim-discussion mailing list
[email protected]
http://ontomail.semdata.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/owlim-discussion
