On 03/14/2012 01:49 PM, Frank Karlitschek wrote:
On 14.03.2012, at 01:46, Roland van Laar<[email protected]>  wrote:

Hello,

Hi Roland,

thank you for your contribution.
It's nice to be thanked.

I added a url routing feature to owncloud.
For now only the root index and the files/index.php work.
lib/setup.php is also patched to setup a correct .htaccess when it's deployed 
behind Apache.
How does it work if ownCloud is running on a webserver other than apache or if 
rewrite support is not installed or the user is not allowed to configure 
rewrites in .htaccess or can´t use .htaccess files at all?
First, for now it doesn't work when rewriting isn't enabled. (I didn't make a merge request because it's not merge ready).

And secondly, owncloud shouldn't work when rewrites and/or .htaccess files (or equivalent) aren't possible.
See my earlier mails about security[1][2] and klaas' response [3]
and my merge-request[4] which aims to fix this for .htaccess files and Apache.

One of the main design goal of ownCloud is that is should run on as many 
servers as possible without problems and don´t require manual configuration 
from the user.

That's a good and noble goal, although the 'run everywhere' matra shouldn't come before basic security because private files that are accessible for the whole world is a bit of a problem.

One of the reasons to add urlrouting is to allow for cleaner urls in owncloud.
It's now possible to remove the .php ending for example.
Another reason is increased security because with urlrouting only files
included in the url patterns are called from apache.
The other files, such as 3rd party libraries are now only accessible via code.
I don´t really see the benefit for ownCloud here. ownCloud is a personal space 
for files and data and not a public website. So we don´t need to care about SEO 
urls or Google or how convenient it is to remember, tweet or mail urls. I agree 
that shorter urls without .php are prettier from an esthetics standpoint but 
this benefit is not strong enough to justify to make ownCloud incompatible with 
a lot of our users.
I don't care about SEO and Google either since it's not useful for owncloud installations. I do care about nice urls and security, although in this case mainly security.

One of the options about not having .php is the ability to be able to rewrite the code in another language or framework
and still have everything work.

It also opens up a lot of possibilities for owncloud code wise because files and urls aren't linked 1 on 1.

A dispatch.php is added which becomes the starting point for all non img,ajax, 
css and js requests.
dispatch.php contains the starting point for urls.

An example url patterns:
$urlPatterns = Array(
    Array('url' =>  '^/$', 'file' =>  'index.php'),
    Array('url' =>  '^/index.php$', 'file' =>  'index.php'),
    Array('url' =>  '^/files', 'dir_include' =>  'files/'),
);

It's possible to include urls.php files in other directories via the
'dir_include' =>  dir_name syntax in the Array.

The code: https://gitorious.org/~rvanlaar/owncloud/rvanlaars-owncloud-urlrouting

What do you think?
Is this something that has the potential to be included in owncloud?

I´m really sorry to say but I think that your proposal is not suitable for 
ownCloud at the moment.
I hate to say this to a new contributor but I hope you understand the reason.

I do understand it. One of the reasons I published the code now is to get feedback.
In the ideal case the dispatch code would be a class OC_route in lib.
That way the code would be cleaner and tie in with the OwnClouds class loader.

How can this code become suitable for OwnCloud?
And is urlrouting something that could be incorporated in OwnCloud?

I suggest to post to this mailing-list earlier next time if you propose big 
architectural changes so that we can discuss this before you spend a lot of 
time coding. :-)

I'm a bit surprised about you saying this. I did communicate about this idea [5][6].
I also got some advice about it [7].
There is even a bug report about it.[8]

However, I wanted to write code that works, instead of talk a lot about it.
An idea with code is better than an idea without, and I wanted to have a proof
of concept.

There are a lot of areas in ownCloud where we need help.

If you need some inspiration you can have a look at:
http://owncloud.org/dev/junior-jobs/  or
http://bugs.owncloud.org/

Well I worked on bug 135 ;-).


It would be awesome if you would help us to improve ownCloud in other areas and 
become a contributor.

OwnCloud is an interesting project that I would like to see become more and more useful.
I already contributed some code and documentation :-).
And I would like to contribute more.

However I would like to see (a bit) more action by the current maintainer/committers.
I made a merge request [4] and there hasn't been any action on it.
I also wrote and email about security [2] for the installation page [9]
because the default install on ubuntu is wide open and I haven't seen that being picked up.


Thanks a lot :-)

Thank you for your time, your reply and your positive words.

Regards,

Roland

Cheers
Frank

[1] https://mail.kde.org/pipermail/owncloud/2012-February/002261.html
[2] https://mail.kde.org/pipermail/owncloud/2012-February/002406.html
[3] https://mail.kde.org/pipermail/owncloud/2012-February/002414.html
[4] https://gitorious.org/owncloud/owncloud/merge_requests/93
[5] https://mail.kde.org/pipermail/owncloud/2012-March/002494.html
[6] https://mail.kde.org/pipermail/owncloud/2012-March/002515.html
[7] https://mail.kde.org/pipermail/owncloud/2012-March/002527.html
[8] http://bugs.owncloud.org/thebuggenie/owncloud/issues/oc-135
[9] http://owncloud.org/support/setup-and-installation/linux-server/
_______________________________________________
Owncloud mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/owncloud

Reply via email to