There being more important topics from your point of view does not make discussing the move less important.
If thebuggenie requires so much configuration (and I bet you don’t mean the interface, or having a single-sign-on so not everyone needs to get yet another account) then it most probably is not the right tool for getting actual work done. After using it several times I for one am seriously annoyed by it and really hate using it. And I know I’m not the only one. If the bikeshed isn’t usable, there’s no need to discuss over what color to paint it. On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 8:11 AM, Thomas Müller <[email protected]> wrote: > From my point of view we have much more important topics than a discussion on > gitorious vs github. > > - continous intregration > - more php unit tests > - js unit tests > - overall test management (looks like the RCs for OC4 have never been tested) > > And most important : configure buggenie properly. As I wrote many times, > buggenie itself is not bad tool (maybe not the best) it just needs some love. > I hope we find some time after the bugfix releases for OC4 > > Tom > > Jan-Christoph Borchardt <[email protected]> schrieb: > >>Against the risk of repeating myself, it is completely ridiculous for >>us to host our own stuff. If it’s free software but not federated, we >>create an island of user interaction where everyone has to get yet >>another new account. >>Another thing, Indefero has a really shitty interface. From their >>website: »Indefero is basically a clone of GoogleCode« – seriously? >> >>Even though I don’t think this is a question of »democratic« decision, >>the majority is pretty clear from the Doodle Lennart opened a while >>ago: http://www.doodle.com/gpqix9engytkyavq (as of writing: 12 Github, >>5 Gitorious, 4 don’t know) >> >>Make no mistake – we discussed this several times already and we are >>all free software activists. We discussed it last time before the move >>from KDE projects to Gitorious and we discuss it this time as well. I >>get that this is an issue where lots of people have an opinion on the >>color of the bike shed – but in this case especially the opinion of >>the core developers has value, who need to work with the system >>(namely Gitorious and Buggenie) and are reasonably pissed about load >>times, SSH issues, downtimes and general usability nightmares. And >>there are some simple factors like exposure and developer base which >>are very important for driving the project forward. >> >> >>So if in the meantime there popped up a nice _federated_ open source >>git web app with integrated issue tracking and pull requests (which >>can be linked) which we ideally don’t need to host ourselves – then >>please speak up. Otherwise I would suggest we, as said before the >>release of ownCloud 4, move to Github. >> >> >> >>On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 11:58 PM, Denis Kot <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Take a look at InDefero http://projects.ceondo.com/p/indefero/ >>> I have installed it at my few servers and it works very good. It has >>> build-in bug tracker (minimalistic), code review, web-gui for git >>> repository and forge management. >>> >>> Denis Kot >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Owncloud mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/owncloud >>_______________________________________________ >>Owncloud mailing list >>[email protected] >>https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/owncloud > _______________________________________________ > Owncloud mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/owncloud _______________________________________________ Owncloud mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/owncloud
