On 29.06.2012 15:58, Robin Appelman wrote:
I dont think extending ocs will be a good idea
I think it does as long as we can keep the APIs kind of consistent. We
have to avoid that OCS is missused as a container for all kind of
specialised apis IMO.
Using more OCS in oC gives us a lot of other interesting options, just
think of "Share this file with my frieds", even though our oC API would
not have to be part of OCS for this.
for non-kde attica only brings an aditional dependecy and is unlikely to be
addopted by i.e. gnome, while wide adaption should be one of the main concerns
with the api. it would be a real shame if akregator would be the only rss
reader to support oc syncing and we dont want to end up being only a cloud
sollution for the kde desktop.
As OCS is an opendesktop standard, this argument does not count. From
technical standpoint its no prob at all and from the 'politcal' it also
should not.
where no existing standards exists (rss, versiong) we should try to work
together with the developers of as many different potentials clients as
possible instead of trying to extend ocs.
OCS is the try to create a widely supported standard where non has been
before which means "work togehter with many developers..."
regards,
klaas
_______________________________________________
Owncloud mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/owncloud
