On 20.08.2012, at 18:24, Jos Poortvliet <[email protected]> wrote: > On Monday, August 20, 2012 17:52:38 Frank Karlitschek wrote: >> Hi everybody, >> > <snip> >> worked very hard and discussed this with a lot of people to find the most >> fair and open solution here. What we have now is an agreement that is >> similar to Qt with the Free Qt foundation so a guarantee that ownCloud is >> always available under the AGPL as it is today. We have a FAQ that explains >> the reasons behind it. If someone has question please ask me :-) >> >> The agreement is here: >> http://owncloud.org/documents/contributor-agreement.pdf The FAQ is here: >> http://owncloud.org/documents/contributor-agreement-faq.pdf > > Looks like I should've waited with my previous mail until I read this one.
:-) > I would suggest to add the example you gave about some customers wanting > proprietary modules for internal integration with their network etc - noting > that we want them to use ownCloud and otherwise they wouldn't be able to. > Just > to give the argument some more 'life' and make clear that it's not just about > the money for ownCloud Inc - but also about being able to go places we > otherwise wouldn't be able to service... Good idea!! > > /hugs > Jos Cheers Frank _______________________________________________ Owncloud mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/owncloud
