Good point. I agree. We do a full release next time if something like this might happen again.
Thanks for the hint Frank On 25.10.2012, at 05:48, Norman Rieß <[email protected]> wrote: > I second that. > A 4.5.1a official release would have been great. > > Regards, > Norman > > Am 25.10.2012 01:06, schrieb Elias Probst: >> Please do never change an already existing tarball. >> Changed checksums of tarballs are a huge PITA for distribution packagers, >> especially for source based distributions such as Gentoo. >> >> I'd ask to you to simply do another release in such a case (which would have >> been 4.5.2 here) - I don't see a reason why this shouldn't be possible. >> >> - Elias >> >> >> On Wednesday 24 October 2012 18:49:08 Frank Karlitschek wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I updated the ownCloud 4.5.1 downloads with an updated version. The links >>> are the same. Internally it´s called 4.5.1a It contains fixes for a >>> regression in the ldap connector and in the breadcrumb navigation. >>> >>> >>> Sorry guys but I can´t help myself. I have to remind everybody that between >>> step 1 (code change) and step 3 (commit) there is always a step 2 (test the >>> change manually yourself) And no. This is not covered by automated testing. >>> This is something every developer has to do. >>> >>> >>> Thanks. >>> >>> :-) >>> >>> Frank >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Owncloud mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/owncloud >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Owncloud mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/owncloud > > _______________________________________________ > Owncloud mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/owncloud _______________________________________________ Owncloud mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/owncloud
