Jan-Christoph Borchardt <[email protected]> > As one of the main proponents of the change to Github (including the > issue tracker) I'll chime in: > > Our priority is developing ownCloud. If one of our tools hinders us, > we need to consider using a different one.
Cool. Several people are reporting that github issues hinders us, so let's consider using a different one, or at least using it differently, right? [...] > I don't want people to use free software because it's free software, > but because it's good. In part, free software is good because it's free software and all the related benefits one gets from that feature. Otherwise, there are enough proprietary cloud services and they'd cover everything. But ownCloud was worth building... why do you think that is? > It's a common free software fallacy to say: »But if you as a big > project (ownCloud) use Gitorious (or any system for any purpose) it > will get more users, then more exposure, and then get better.« Nothing > like that happened with Gitorious or Buggenie while we used it, each > for about a year. And if it doesn't work for us, we have to look for a > system which does. It's a common Internet fallacy to make up "common" statements that no-one ever said, then argue against them! I doubt anyone would say mere use will improve things and I don't know where the above quote came from. For ownCloud to have a positive effect on Gitorious or Buggenie, their bugs would need to be reported and so on. Did that happen? In other words, where are they in the bug genie bug tracker or forums? For my part, I reported the bug genie registration bug that I found, as best I could (I couldn't report it to their own bug genie because I couldn't register): https://mobile.twitter.com/thebuggenie/status/255726991725174784 > We discussed this several times on the mailing list - I know because I > brought it up so often, and it wasn't cut short. > It was discussed enough - now we act, and push onward. That seems contrary to what several people are expressing in this discussion, saying it was cut short with things like this http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/owncloud/2012-September/005565.html The move to github issues locks some out, as it currently stands, which seems a poor decision if ownCloud needs more contributors. Can't a more consensual solution be found, rather than the remaining contributors pushing forwards alone? Personally, I don't mind if that's still using github issues, as long as there's some way for people to interact without entering into a github contract. Is there? Regards, -- MJ Ray (slef), member of www.software.coop, a for-more-than-profit co-op. http://koha-community.org supporter, web and library systems developer. In My Opinion Only: see http://mjr.towers.org.uk/email.html Available for hire (including development) at http://www.software.coop/ _______________________________________________ Owncloud mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/owncloud
