On Saturday 15 December 2012 14:41:46 Frank Karlitschek wrote:
> 
> On 15.12.2012, at 13:54, hemathor <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> > On Saturday 15 December 2012 03:05:12 Michael Grosser wrote:
> >> funny thing,
> >> 
> >> hope we will make a great 5.0 release and really test it badly this time...
> > 
> > with emphasis on 'this time'? ;)
> > 
> > 
> >> with a lot of new working features.
> >> so we can even please the mainstream :D
> > 
> > and please, please, please (prettyplease with a cherry on top): check the 
> > client syncing (here: on linux) thoroughly! it still messes up a lot of my 
> > files and pollutes it with myriads of conflict-files... and i have just one 
> > server and two clients, which don't even access/change files at the same 
> > time (apart from the csync client)...
> > 
> > but still good work, anyway. i just have the impression that you guys want 
> > too much in too little time, instead of having something, that works 
> > rocksolid, and then go from there... but who cares what i think...
> > 
> 
> Well Klaas, Danimo and a few others are working full time and super hard on 
> the clients. 

i'm sorry, if i offended someone... i really like the idea of owncloud and i am 
grateful for all your work!
but as i said, focussing on things to work reliably (which i think is _the_ 
most important thing especially regarding syncing) instead of adding features 
wouldn't do any harm at all.

> But more help is always appreciated. For example testing under all possible 
> conditions with good step by step description of possible bugs is a huge 
> help. 
> So if you want to contribute feel free to help :-)

believe it or not, i already thought of it... ;) ask me again after march 2013, 
then i might have more time to do so.

greetings...
_______________________________________________
Owncloud mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/owncloud

Reply via email to