Hi,
I did not want to start a discussion about splitting up of the apps
repository. I know that this is already happening and I think that it's
a good idea.
The point I'm talking about is the introduction of a namespace for the
new app repositories. As some of you pointed out that it won't improve
the UX and everybody knows how to use the search I consider this
proposal to be rejected.
Jakob
Am 18.03.2013 07:50, schrieb Frank Karlitschek:
As I said.
It's O.K. for curtain "bigger" apps to have an own repository. And only if the
maintainer requests it.
Having this for every single small app introduces chaos without a benefit.
In the meantime I suggest that we try to fix the urgent bugs that we currently
have instead of discussions like that that don't improve the experience for
ownCloud users.
Frank
On 17.03.2013, at 23:06, Alessandro Cosentino<[email protected]> wrote:
I totally agree on this splitting and I totally agree with the naming
proposed by Jakob.
Code and commits should be easy to migrate. Is it easy to do the
migration of the issues to the new repos?
Alessandro
On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 9:44 PM, Frank Karlitschek<[email protected]> wrote:
On 17.03.2013, at 21:30, Jakob Sack<[email protected]> wrote:
Hello,
I really like the idea of splitting up the apps repository by creating a
repository for each app.
I think it makes sense for the big apps where the developers request such a change. For a
lot of the smaller ones an apps repo for "the rest" is not a problem.
However, I dislike the current names of these
repositories.
I'd prefer a naming schema like "app-mail" and "app-news". This way it'd be
easy to distinguish the app repositories from the other 20+ repositories.
Yes. I can rename them if the people who are working in them agree.
Any comments?
Best,
Jakob
_______________________________________________
Owncloud mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/owncloud
