There is no schema for the "document" namespace. Using this namespace is 100% optional. You can as well use XHTML directly.
The benefit of using a distinct namespace is to make it more explicit that the elements are not sent directly to a client, but that they are styled first.
The important thing is that whatever elements you use, your theme deals with them. With the default epilogue in 1.5.2, the theme is themes/theme1.xsl in oxf.jar. (With the upcoming 2.0, the theme has been moved to resources/oxf-theme/theme.xsl.) But you can (and eventually you should) create your own epilogue and your own theme.
-Erik
Justin Makeig wrote:
> Does a schema exist for the document namespace > (http://orbeon.org/oxf/xml/document)? I'm trying to determine which types of > elements can appear there and which would be better suited for XHTML. For > example, why recreate the h1 element in the > http://orbeon.org/oxf/xml/document namespace? Wouldn't this be more suited > for XHTML. Or perhaps I'm missing the crux of the document namespace. > Thanks. > > - Justin
_______________________________________________ oxf-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.orbeon.com/mailman/listinfo/oxf-users
