I've implemented OXF's XHTML serializer successfully. However, the HTML that
the XForms processor produces is not valid XHTML (version 1.1, in my case,
but it also fails version 1.0). The two problems I have found are:

(1) The children of XHTML <form> elements must be block-level. By default,
the XForms output processor generates something like:

<form name="xforms">
 <input type="hidden" name="submitted" value="true" />
 <!-- etc. -->
</form>

Even though it's of type hidden, the <input> element is still inline and
thus not a valid child of <form>. The addition of a div (XHTML's generic
block-level element) would solve the problem without any rendering
differences given that <form> is also a block-level element.

<form name="xforms">
 <div>
  <input type="hidden" name="submitted" value="true" />
  <!-- etc. -->
 </div>
</form>

will come closer to validating as XHTML (see below).

(2) The name attribute of the <form> element has been deprecated in XHTML in
favor of the id attribute (name is still valid for <input> elements,
though). However, by filtering out the name attribute from the XFroms output
in the epilogue, one breaks the inline JavaScript that underlies the
xxforms:set element.

For example, the inline JavaScript for a xxforms:set element referencing an
XForm instance whose id is xforms begins like this:

var f=document.forms['xforms'];

where 'xforms' refers to a named form.

A cumbersome, temporary solution would be to replace name attribute with an
id attribute, look out for and modify the inline JavaScript, and add a div
as the form's first child in the epilogue. However, this is unintuitive and
would make more sense built into the XForms processor.

Has anyone else worked around this? Am I crazy for requiring valid XHTML?
(Hopefully, not.)

Any assistance would be much appreciated.

- Justin Makeig

--
Center for Document Engineering
University of California, Berkeley

_______________________________________________
oxf-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.orbeon.com/mailman/listinfo/oxf-users

Reply via email to