Hi Bob,

You are right, the new file template we have for 5.1 Book is located here:

OXYGEN_INSTALL_DIR\frameworks\docbook\templates\Docbook 5.1 
(Experimental)\Book.xml

and indeed it did not have the proper version set on the schema. This will be corrected in the next Oxygen 18.0 minor bug fix release.

Regards,
Radu

Radu Coravu
<oXygen/>  XML Editor, Schema Editor and XSLT Editor/Debugger
http://www.oxygenxml.com

On 4/29/2016 11:15 PM, Bob Stayton wrote:
I've been looking at Oxygen 18's DocBook 5.1 support a bit.

When I do File > New and select a DocBook 5.1 template, I actually get a
5.0 document.  The version="5.0" and <?xml-model ?> processing
instructions that Oxygen adds at the top point to 5.0.  I guess this bit
hasn't been updated yet.

However, if I just change the number in the xml-model processing
instructions from 5.0 to 5.1 and reload the document, it validates as 5.1.

<?xml-model href="http://docbook.org/xml/5.1/rng/docbook.rng";
schematypens="http://relaxng.org/ns/structure/1.0";?>
<?xml-model href="http://docbook.org/xml/5.1/rng/docbook.rng";
type="application/xml"
schematypens="http://purl.oclc.org/dsdl/schematron";?>

The XML catalog that Oxygen includes for 5.1 uses "5.1", not "5.1CR3".

Bob Stayton
Sagehill Enterprises
[email protected]

On 4/28/2016 2:23 AM, Erik Zander wrote:
Hi,



I have a docbook file that conforms to the docbook 5.1CR3 schema but not
5.0.



My version attribute in the root element is set to 5.1CR3 but when I
press validate it validates the document with the 5.0 schema.



Am I missing something in the requirements?



Regards

Erik Zander



_______________________________________________
oXygen-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.oxygenxml.com/mailman/listinfo/oxygen-user

_______________________________________________
oXygen-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.oxygenxml.com/mailman/listinfo/oxygen-user

_______________________________________________
oXygen-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.oxygenxml.com/mailman/listinfo/oxygen-user

Reply via email to