On 18 May 2010 14:29, silky <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 2:19 PM, Dylan Tusler > <[email protected]> wrote: > > Is >= slower than > by itself? > > At an assembly level it's a very similar instruction. You'd need to do > some analysis at a lower level to see if one was really better. >
The number of clocks required to execute a given instruction changes on a per CPU generation/vendor/architecture basis. It'd be nice to think we can all write code that is efficient to that extreme, but I suspect your application might have better performance gains by focussing your efforts elsewhere. ;) -- David Connors ([email protected]) Software Engineer Codify Pty Ltd - www.codify.com Phone: +61 (7) 3210 6268 | Facsimile: +61 (7) 3210 6269 | Mobile: +61 417 189 363 V-Card: https://www.codify.com/cards/davidconnors Address Info: https://www.codify.com/contact
