But would one of them be "easier" to implement with the .Net 4.0 parallel extensions?
-David Burela Senior Consultant Hazaa -----Original Message----- From: ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com [mailto:ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com] On Behalf Of Les Hughes Sent: Thursday, 20 May 2010 3:48 PM To: ozDotNet Subject: Re: How To do something every so often Greg Harris wrote: > > Hi Everyone, > > I think that this shows that we all have too much time on our hands! > You especially... but we appreciate it :) > > As about 80% of development cost is in maintenance, then keep it > simple unless you really really need to change it for a good reason. > So DON'T CHANGE THIS! > I still think Bill's answer was superior, as it also accounts for multiple threads/etc (although, not required in this case). Second to that would be a (if blah > rah; print thing; blah = 0) ...as your tests indicated. On hard to read/complexity/whatver... I would argue that for a seasoned developer, using boolean logic isn't anything tricky, nor hard to read when used appropriately. If the hex figure scares you a little, you can throw it into calc.exe to get the value, or even just comment it in. Anyway... good work, all we need is a test to proove once and for all that VB is superior to C#. :P -- Les Hughes <mailto:l...@datarev.com.au> l...@datarev.com.au
