Ah silky, You must have a huge target painted on you with a little picture of a flame in the middle :)
Not that I want to take sides here but the OP didn't seem to take offense to the "offending" comment so there's no need to pounce on someone in that regard. I highly recommend making sure you understand the mood of the comment (eg light hearted) and then decided to pounce with flame throwers a blazing. Then we can all be smiles and sunshine :) <cue hippy song> David "If we can hit that bullseye, the rest of the dominoes will fall like a house of cards... checkmate!" -Zapp Brannigan, Futurama On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 02:33, Ken Schaefer <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 > > "terrible" is one of those subjective adjectives that casts the subject in a > negative light, and by implication the person who posted it. If you are going > to take pot-shots from the sidelines (i.e. not provide an illustrative > counter example to demonstrate your point) then you should keep your opinions > to yourself > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On > Behalf Of David Kean > Sent: Thursday, 17 June 2010 10:41 PM > To: [email protected]; ozDotNet > Subject: RE: How to validate directory path > >> Ignoring the terrible coding style. > Comments like this don't help the conversation. > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On > Behalf Of silky > Sent: Thursday, June 17, 2010 3:32 AM > To: ozDotNet > Subject: Re: How to validate directory path > > On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 7:30 PM, James Chapman-Smith <[email protected]> > wrote: >> How about this? > > Ignoring the terrible coding style, it assumes that you've got delete > priveledges, which may not be the case. It also assumes that nothing gets put > in that directory outside of the program, etc. > > -- > silky > > http://www.programmingbranch.com/ > >
