On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 3:04 PM, DotNet Dude <[email protected]> wrote: > Would LLBLGen still be your choice when only custom stored > procedures are used?
Depends how "only" only is. It's hard for me to answer this unbiasedly. I would say "yes" still, but that's because I know I wouldn't be using "only" custom stored procedures. If only is truly "only" (which would, IMHO, but quite weird) then I would say no. There is on benefit at all really. May as well just write a 2-second wrapper to call them. That said, I think you can probably do things in LLBLGen to type your stored procedures in some fashion. I haven't taken the time to look into it, because it isn't relevant for me. I use a few stored procedures, typically, but not a lot. -- silky Every morning when I wake up, I experience an exquisite joy — the joy of being this signature.
