On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 10:35 PM, Ian Thomas <[email protected]> wrote: > Exciting is definitely the word I would use. > > What's dull and pedestrian about destroying a great proportion of PhD theses > and academic papers? If the proof is correct ...
It'd be significantly more than "exciting". I don't see what's good about destroying someones work, though. I do see something good, however, in opening up a new field of work, that is the field of trying to generate all the algorithms to generate algorithms that generate solutions to all the worlds complex problems. But seriously though, I'm certain a person such as yourself doesn't actually believe that P=NP will be shown. And not in a "quantum-computers-are-far-away" type scenario; it just won't happen. > ________________________________ > Ian Thomas > Victoria Park, Western Australia -- silky http://dnoondt.wordpress.com/ "Every morning when I wake up, I experience an exquisite joy — the joy of being this signature."
