On 9 September 2010 13:39, silky <[email protected]> wrote:

> I agree on "heavy" use, but I certainly think there is an area of
> "legitimate" use, no?


No. :)


> I often have one or n triggers in any given
> database (~5 in total?) for little items. And changing it over to a
> stored-procedure based system just wouldn't be appropriate (IMHO,
> because it's all handled via the OR/M).
>

I *am* on the opposite end of the opinion scale to the rest of the Internet
when it comes to OR/Ms. :)

I'm pretty sure you'd be happy with general use of them, right? Or
> flat-out no use at all?
>

Flat out no use at all unless you had some pretty damned clear guidance on
what constitutes acceptable use or not.

Users of the database write SQL and the SQL does not do what it says on the
tin as a result of triggers changing the nature of the set operations. That
automatically qualifies them as having a negative impact on your application
in my book.

-- 
*David Connors* | [email protected] | www.codify.com
Software Engineer
Codify Pty Ltd
Phone: +61 (7) 3210 6268 | Facsimile: +61 (7) 3210 6269 | Mobile: +61 417
189 363
V-Card: https://www.codify.com/cards/davidconnors
Address Info: https://www.codify.com/contact

Reply via email to