Try commenting our the IConvertible code, and instead walk up the call stack
a bit and add some GC.Collect etc, and see if that is the difference.

|-----Original Message-----
|From: [email protected] [mailto:ozdotnet-
|[email protected]] On Behalf Of Greg Keogh
|Sent: Monday, 18 October 2010 11:31 PM
|To: 'ozDotNet'
|Subject: object must implement ICOnvertible
|
|I have a classic case of a problem that is sucking all of the enjoyment out
of this
|profession. No it doesn't just suck, it's giving me the stinking shits.
|
|
|
|We failed to make a release tonight because of incomprehensible crashes and
|behaviour with our 7 year old well-tested app when deployed to a Windows
|2003 Server. The suite runs and behaves perfectly on our development
|machines, but when the MSIs were built and installed it all went to hell in
a
|hand basket with errors we have never seen in our lives. I double checked
all of
|the build options and the Framework versions and references of the 52
projects
|to check for accidental mismatches, but it all looked good.
|
|
|
|After running hours of tests I eventually managed to log a nested exception
in
|the client app that was opening a binary Remoting channel to the server.
One
|exception referred to a problem with serializing a MarshalByRefObject,
|another gave the vital clue "object must implement IConvertible".
|
|
|
|Web searches produced hundreds of hits on this IConvertible message, but
|there were no answers anywhere.
|
|
|
|So just for the hell of it (I had no other option) I added the IConvertible
|interface to the MarshalByRefObject class used in the Remoting code. I left
|dummy throws in the 17 useless methods of the interface. I rebuilt,
redeployed
|and it all worked.
|
|
|
|So why the hell would I suddenly need to implement this interface (without
any
|working code) on a MarshalByRefObject class to prevent it crashing on
certain
|machines? This problem happened on different Win3K machines in different
|testing locations. I can find no pattern anywhere to explain it.
|
|
|
|Greg


Reply via email to