Yeah the first time I ran it over my own code I nearly had a heart attack! On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 9:38 AM, Peter Gfader <[email protected]> wrote:
> +1 to Pex > It is awesome for generating test inputs. > > If another dev comes to you and says: "I am done" > You run Pex over those methods and get quite a lot of exceptions ;-) > > .peter.gfader. > http://blog.gfader.com > > > > On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 11:55 AM, silky <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 10:04 AM, Simon Reed >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> > Not exactly new but I don't remember seeing it mentioned on here before >> Pex >> > automated white box testing. Unit testing for people who don't like >> writing >> > endless unit tests. Also moles for delegate testing. Been playing around >> > with it for a while and the time savings are good but the learning curve >> to >> > get the most out of it can be a bit steep. >> >> Cool; also from the list of VS "Power Tools"; this looks pretty cool: >> >> >> http://visualstudiogallery.msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/271d0904-f178-4ce9-956b-d9bfa4902745 >> >> >> > Simon >> > >> > http://research.microsoft.com/en-us/projects/pex/ >> >> -- >> silky >> >> http://dnoondt.wordpress.com/ >> >> "Every morning when I wake up, I experience an exquisite joy — the joy >> of being this signature." >> > > > > -- > > .peter.gfader. > http://blog.gfader.com/ > http://twitter.com/peitor > > >
