Yes, you're right (even accounting for some exaggeration by Greg Keogh).
Best adsl2+ would be 24mbps / 1mbps vs 300s/2s. so, I will be interesting to
know the correct reason for the discrepancy. 

 

  _____  

Ian Thomas
Victoria Park, Western Australia

  _____  

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
On Behalf Of Joseph Cooney
Sent: Wednesday, November 24, 2010 12:41 AM
To: ozDotNet
Subject: Re: Azure DB performance

 

Maybe there's something fundamental I'm overlooking here, but 5 mins == 300
seconds. Reads take 2 seconds, so writes are 150x worse than reads, not 30x
worse.

Joseph

 

On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 11:56 PM, Ian Thomas <[email protected]> wrote:

Assuming you have plain ADSL+ and not something less asymmetric such as
Annexe M or Bonded DSL, or better - you would expect perhaps 20 times worse
performance on upload just because of the internet connection. 5mins to 2
secs = 30 times. 

 

  _____  

Ian Thomas
Victoria Park, Western Australia

  _____  

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
On Behalf Of Greg Keogh
Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 2010 7:28 PM
To: 'ozDotNet'
Subject: Azure DB performance

 

Folks, after an hour of suffering weird errors I managed to create my first
Azure database and a small console app to copy rows from a local table into
the Azure one. I got a bit of a fright when it took about 5 minutes to
insert the 1177 rows into the Azure table. Luckily however, it only takes
about 2 seconds to read them all back with a DatAdapter.Fill and show the
resulting DataTable in a WinForms grid.

 

I'm quite surprised by the wildly different timings for inserts vs reads.
Has anyone experienced this?

 

Is anyone using Azure DBs in anger and has anything startling to report?
Gotchas?

 

It's great to be able to have "roaming" databases with such ease just by
tweaking the connection strings. It creates lots of convenient alternatives
for the way disconnected apps can be designed.

 

Greg

  _____  

No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 10.0.1153 / Virus Database: 424/3267 - Release Date: 11/19/10




-- 

 

w: http://jcooney.net

t: @josephcooney

 

  _____  

No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 10.0.1153 / Virus Database: 424/3267 - Release Date: 11/19/10

Reply via email to