On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 3:48 PM, David Kean <[email protected]> wrote:

>  Now I’m from Microsoft, so bear in mind that we tend to over engineer
> solutions, however, we typically make sure *everything* is in source
> control. (In the Developer Division case, this even extends to.NET [and
> VS!], but completely ignore that part)
>
>
>
> In any shop above a few developers I would personally put anything that
> doesn’t come with a standard VS installation, including build scripts  (even
> build targets such as  Silverlight v4.0 targets) and any 2nd/3rd party
> references. This makes ensures that the Devs and the build machines are
> always building *exactly* the same thing – unfortunately, in certain
> situations MSBuild will pull references from the GAC if it can’t find them
> anywhere else, with can lead to issues such as devs compiling against some
> fandangled new version installed on their box, instead of the one they
> should be compiling against.
>
>
>
> This also has the advantage of making it easier for new devs, because all
> you need to tell them to install VS and do a full *get* of the database.
>
>

If only VS did xcopy deployment, you could tell them just to do a full get.
 Some quite complex setups do work with xcopy, so how about it?


>
>
> With regards to the automigration thing with Telerik, wouldn’t this happen
> automatically when you checked in and overwrote the new binaries?
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* [email protected] [mailto:
> [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *David Burela
> *Sent:* Monday, February 07, 2011 8:09 PM
> *To:* ozDotNet
> *Subject:* Handling 3rd party assemblies with build servers
>
>
>
> For the last few years I've used a fairly standard way of handling 3rd
> party assemblies.
>
> In source control, I create a folder called "3rd Party Assemblies" which is
> where I put all the external references (like nSubstitues, Ninject, etc.).
>
>
>
> /DavidSolution
>
> DavidSolution.sln
>
>     /3rdPartyAssemblies
>
>         /nSubstitue
>
>         /Ninject
>
>         /...
>
>     /Project1
>
>     /Project 2
>
>     /...
>
>
>
>
>
> It works well, learnt it from Mitch years ago. However something that has
> always tripped me up, is how do you handle assembiles that are installed on
> the computer?
>
> Here I am thinking of *Telerik, Component art, DevExpress,* and most other
> purchased libraries.
>
>
>
> At the moment I am using Telerik, you need to install it onto your machine
> and it puts the license file somewhere.
>
> We have a number of devs working on the same project, so we all install the
> tools on.
>
> Now when it comes to building, i'll need to install the tools into the
> build server. Whenever a new version comes out, i'll need to get everyone to
> update the computers and if they forget, then people are out of sync, or
> they could be working on 3 different projects and their other projects may
> not be upgraded yet.
>
>
>
> If I copy all the Telerik controls that I need into the 3rd Party Assembly
> folder, then when I upgrade my version of Telerik I can just copy the new
> .dlls into the 3rd party assembly folder, and all other devs will
> automatically pull down those .dlls with a get latest. and hopefully the
> build server will work with them just in the 3rd party assembly folder, but
> there might be a license issue?
>
>
>
> Putting the .dlls into the 3rd party assembiles folder seems like a good
> idea to make sure that the project is on a specific version of the tools.
> BUT then you lose some other features like having Telerik automatic
> migration your solution references to the latest version of the assemblies.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *So to sum up my question:*
>
> With the libraries that you need to install (Telerik, Component Art,
> DevExpress). How do you guys handle the assembly references? Include in
> source control, install the framework on EVERY computer? or some other
> solution?
>
> -David Burela
>



-- 
Meski

"Going to Starbucks for coffee is like going to prison for sex. Sure, you'll
get it, but it's going to be rough" - Adam Hills

Reply via email to