Last year when I was presenting on WP7, I did have someone in the audience ask me once when Microsoft would get VS2010 running on Windows Phone 7.
I can't even imagine what it would be like trying to write code with a touchscreen and predictive text. Or how he'd want to debug code. On 17 February 2011 14:46, Peter Gfader <pe...@gfader.com> wrote: > >>VS stopped working on my phone > > David, you are not really running VS on your WP... are you? > > .peter.gfader. > http://blog.gfader.com > > > On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 1:49 PM, David Kean <david.k...@microsoft.com>wrote: > >> Hmm...that wasn't to my recollection. I could have sworn that it allowed >> indexing and length checks even if the underlying implementations didn't >> support it (ie not via late binding). Unfortunately VS stopped working on >> my phone so I'll need to wait until I get in back in the office to play >> around. >> >> Sent from my Windows Phone >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Bill McCarthy >> Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2011 6:28 PM >> To: 'ozDotNet' >> Subject: RE: LINQ extensions >> >> >> That's only if you have Strict Off and use late binding. >> >> |-----Original Message----- >> |From: ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com [mailto:ozdotnet- >> |boun...@ozdotnet.com] On Behalf Of David Kean >> |Sent: Thursday, 17 February 2011 1:18 PM >> |To: ozDotNet >> |Subject: RE: LINQ extensions >> | >> |Not true - try this in VB. >> | >> |Sent from my Windows Phone >> |________________________________ >> | >> |From: Tristan Reeves >> |Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2011 5:24 PM >> |To: ozDotNet >> |Subject: Re: LINQ extensions >> | >> | >> |That's true, but you never would, with or without linq. That is because >> |IEnumerable does not have such a property. >> | >> | >> |On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 4:55 PM, James Chapman-Smith >> |<ja...@enigmativity.com> wrote: >> | >> | >> | LINQ doesn't cause `.Length` to disappear, but if you assign the >> array to >> |an `IEnumerable<T>` then you won't seen the `.Length` property. >> | >> | >> | >> | From: ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com [mailto:ozdotnet- >> |boun...@ozdotnet.com] On Behalf Of Tristan Reeves >> | Sent: Wednesday, 16 February 2011 11:54 >> | >> | >> | To: ozDotNet >> | Subject: Re: LINQ extensions >> | >> | >> | >> | >> | >> | >> | >> | But Length is always a (valid) property of arrays, whether or not >> LINQ is >> |reference. Or are you saying that Length "disappears" when LINQ is >> |referenced? >> | >> | >> | >> | Tristan. >> | >> | On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 4:23 PM, Ian Thomas < >> il.tho...@iinet.net.au> >> |wrote: >> | >> | Michael - slip of the fingers - yes, it was a .Count method (when >> LINQ is >> |referenced), and a .Length property (when not). Not weird, lang c# >> | >> | >> | >> | >> |________________________________ >> | >> | >> | Ian Thomas >> | Victoria Park, Western Australia >> | >> | >> |________________________________ >> | >> | >> | From: ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com [mailto:ozdotnet- >> |boun...@ozdotnet.com] On Behalf Of Michael Minutillo >> | Sent: Tuesday, February 15, 2011 1:20 PM >> | To: ozDotNet >> | Subject: Re: LINQ extensions >> | >> | >> | >> | Weird. It should add a .Count() extension method, not a property. >> Are >> |you coding in a language that has optional parentheses by any chance? >> | >> | On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 1:12 PM, Ian Thomas < >> il.tho...@iinet.net.au> >> |wrote: >> | >> | FYI only >> | >> | Just an oddity I hadn't taken in before, that a reference to LINQ >> makes >> |.Count a valid property of arrays (otherwise .Length is valid). >> | >> | I had been using LINQ to Objects in a small projects and changed >> it >> to >> |not do so, meticulously cleaned references to LINQ out (VS2008 does not >> seem >> |to do that thoroughly), and had a couple of errors arise with >> myarrays.Count >> |statements I had been slack enough to write previously. >> | >> | Framework 3.5 >> | >> | >> |________________________________ >> | >> | >> | Ian Thomas >> | Victoria Park, Western Australia >> | >> | >> | >> | >> | >> >> >> >> > > > -- > > .peter.gfader. > http://blog.gfader.com/ > http://twitter.com/peitor > > >
