You did not mean to send this only to me, I'm sure :P Anyway, the point is that you can log something and then throw it up the chain for someone else to deal with. It's appropriate to log errors, but just because you log doesn't mean you can actually do anything better than crash (upwards).
I think it should also be purely "throw"; as I believe "throw ex" loses some history. On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 9:24 AM, Arjang Assadi <[email protected]> wrote: > What is the point of catching and throwing the same exception e.g. : > > catch (Exception ex) > { > throw ex; > } > > ? > > Thank you in advance > > Regards > > Arjang > -- Noon Silk http://dnoondt.wordpress.com/ (Noon Silk) | http://www.mirios.com.au:8081 > Fancy a quantum lunch? http://www.mirios.com.au:8081/index.php?title=Quantum_Lunch "Every morning when I wake up, I experience an exquisite joy — the joy of being this signature."
