Hi Michael, I also used to think that webforms is the wrong way of doing web development, but have found that the two model have their own cons and pros. I would recomend doing MVC but without having anything against the Web Forms model, Web Forms Model is now the quick and dirty way for small apps that would never need to see the daylight beyound being prototype, like every other App that went from prototype to being exactly what customer wanted!
Regards Arjang On 10 August 2011 15:11, Michael Ridland <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi > > Smart Employers look for someone who's smart, can learn and gets things > done. I would take on someone based on that not what specific platform > knowledge they had. > > It's great to learn MVC first. Learning WebForms will teach you the wrong > way to do web development. > > ps, where are you based? can you send me your CV I might know someone > interested? > > Thanks, > > Michael Ridland | ThinkSmart Digital > Managing Director > P. 0404 865 350 > E. [email protected] > W. www.thinksmartdigital.com.au > T. www.twitter.com/rid00z > L. au.linkedin.com/in/michaelridland > > On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 2:28 PM, Simon Kuldin > <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Hi William, >> >> >> >> Thanks.. maybe I’ll have a go at the exam once I’ve done enough study via >> the pluralsight website. That being said, I probably should have started >> with WebForms rather than MVC, but I’m already curious with MVC now. >> >> >> >> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] >> On Behalf Of William Luu >> Sent: Wednesday, 10 August 2011 1:10 PM >> >> To: ozDotNet >> Subject: Re: Web Development >> >> >> >> Hi Simon, perhaps if you passed one of those MS ASP.NET exams it may help? >> >> >> >> Maybe this one? 70-515: "Web Applications Development with Microsoft .NET >> Framework 4" http://www.microsoft.com/learning/en/us/exam.aspx?ID=70-515 >> >> On 10 August 2011 13:02, Simon Kuldin <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> Cheers for the feedback… I guess I just have to continue on with my home >> attempts at building a website via ASP MVC 3… >> >> >> >> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] >> On Behalf Of William Luu >> Sent: Wednesday, 10 August 2011 12:48 PM >> To: ozDotNet >> Subject: Re: Web Development >> >> >> >> Simon, while I'd say no it doesn't make you un-employable. It does mean it >> may be a little more difficult to get through the door for the first >> interview compared with someone else who has the same amount of .NET >> experience as yourself, but as an ASP.NET dev. >> >> >> >> That said, it also depends on what the company that is hiring is after. >> I'm sure there are many companies out there that are actively searching for >> good .NET developers and would happily give you a go. >> >> On 10 August 2011 12:26, Simon Kuldin <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> I meant *un*employable >> >> >> >> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] >> On Behalf Of Simon Kuldin >> Sent: Wednesday, 10 August 2011 12:18 PM >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: Web Development >> >> >> >> Hey there everyone, >> >> >> >> It seems to me that almost all of the Dot Net jobs advertised out there, >> require a decent level of ASP.NET experience. Does that mean I’m pretty >> much employable since I have little to no ASP.NET experience, despite my >> level of Dot Net experience in WinForms and Compact Framework development? >> >> >> >> I am studying ASP.NET when I can, but don’t have any real work experience >> with it yet. >> >> >> >> I feel like I’m fighting an uphill battle to try and get into a full-time >> Dot Net development role (I’m only doing Dot Net development as a portion of >> my job at the moment). >> >> >> >> > > > > > >
