While I like C#'s dynamic better than VB's (although I'm sure if Bill's still 
floating around he'll argue differently) - VB actually supported 'dynamic' from 
day 1 . :)

From: ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com [mailto:ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com] On 
Behalf Of Ian Thomas
Sent: Monday, October 03, 2011 6:15 PM
To: 'ozDotNet'
Subject: RE: In praise of DirectoryInfo Framework 4

You are right of course, David.
Strange that this 
page<http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/system.io.directoryinfo.enumeratedirectories(VS.90).aspx>
 exists, more than a year after its last edit date ... obviously it is a 
problem with the MSDN doco since the .enumeratedirectory (etc) doesn't work 
with v3.5 target.
I have been using v4.0 for all disk file traversing, and for the Dynamic 
keyword in C# 4.0 - I think this will be in Visual Basic too, when the v4.5 
Framework is released.

________________________________

Ian Thomas
Victoria Park, Western Australia

________________________________
From: ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com [mailto:ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com] On 
Behalf Of David Kean
Sent: Monday, October 03, 2011 11:00 AM
To: ozDotNet
Subject: RE: In praise of DirectoryInfo Framework 4

Pretty sure we added the EnumerateXXX in 4.0, not 3.5.

From: ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com [mailto:ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com] On 
Behalf Of Ian Thomas
Sent: Sunday, October 02, 2011 7:56 PM
To: 'ozDotNet'
Subject: RE: In praise of DirectoryInfo Framework 4


There's always a What's 
New<http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms171868.aspx> when a new Framework 
version is released. And, I was correct - those (originally-cited) methods were 
in v3.5. But the .TryParse additions I had not seen.

Reply via email to