BitBucketttt +++++1 :) On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 11:54 PM, Preet Sangha <[email protected]>wrote:
> Thank you I'll look at BitBucket again. > > > On 18 October 2011 01:51, Joseph Cooney <[email protected]> wrote: > >> bitbucket has issue tracking. >> >> Although I prefer mercurial git seems to work for me, and a number of >> other people, on Windows. >> >> Joseph >> >> >> On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 10:46 PM, Preet Sangha <[email protected]>wrote: >> >>> Bitbucket doesn't have an issue tracking system like the two I >>> mentioned. Git is not being considered as mercurial has better windows >>> support. >>> >>> But thank you for the suggestions. >>> >>> >>> On 17 October 2011 22:38, Joseph Cooney <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Other than github and bitbucket? >>>> >>>> On 17/10/2011, at 1:09 PM, Preet Sangha <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> Guys, >>>> >>>> I've been asked to evaluate cloud hosted source control and issue >>>> tracking and was wondering if you guys have any recommendations. >>>> >>>> We're currently looking at: >>>> >>>> - Hosted TFS >>>> - Fogbuz/Kiln >>>> >>>> I personally prefer a DVCS based solution as this really is the future >>>> but my my colleagues and I are familiar with TFS so may be it's a get up >>>> and go quickly solution for them >>>> >>>> -- >>>> regards, >>>> Preet, Overlooking the Ocean, Auckland >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> regards, >>> Preet, Overlooking the Ocean, Auckland >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> w: http://jcooney.net >> t: @josephcooney >> >> > > > -- > regards, > Preet, Overlooking the Ocean, Auckland >
