Try converting it, there will be some problems. But as long as you stop the 
wizard from converting the web type you should be able to fix in a couple of 
weeks. It's the components that were used in the site that will cause you the 
most grief, but back in 1.0 days there wasn't the framework mania that exists 
today.  

Good luck

Davy
Hexed into a portable ouija board. 

-----Original Message-----
From: Preet Sangha <[email protected]>
Sender: [email protected]
Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2012 19:12:06 
To: ozDotNet<[email protected]>
Reply-To: ozDotNet <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: ASP.Net 1.0 in 3.5 container

Sorry Michael I don't know - I've not touched ASP.NET (except for WCF) for
years.

On 13 June 2012 18:58, Michael Ridland <[email protected]> wrote:

>
> With that you can also use a distributed session state.
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 4:51 PM, Preet Sangha <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>> I've not done this, but I'm wondering if you can just use two virtual
>> directories each with a different WebApplication framework/type? And
>> Hyperlink between them? You can upgrade the old pages as time allows, and
>>  as time allows add new functionality the 3.5 application?
>>
>>
>> On 13 June 2012 17:04, Grant Molloy <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi all..
>>>
>>> So my boss came to me yesterday and asks me to look into and build a
>>> prototype for an ASP.Net 3.5 web app which would need to act as a container
>>> for an ancient ASP.Net 1.0 app..
>>> 1.0 app is well and truely past due for life cycling, but org doesn't
>>> want to do big bang tech refresh, as have recently had fingers burnt on
>>> another!
>>>
>>> The request...
>>> "The prefered approach would be to come up with a solution that allows
>>> existing functionality to remain 'as-is' and new functionality to be
>>> developed in .Net 3.5.
>>> Over time existing functionality can be upgraded (from 1.0 to 3.5) as
>>> the need arises.
>>>
>>> Can you look at building a simple prototype in 3.5 that acts as a
>>> container to 'Project ABC' web presentation functionality? The focus would
>>> be to identify possible options for integration between 3.5 and 1.0 at a
>>> presentation level..  Some key challenges include
>>> * how to host 1.0 components within a 3.5 container
>>> * how to integrate navigation from UIP (3.5) to 1.0 model
>>> * how to sync data between 3.5 and 1.0 (eg. Session state)
>>> * how to best isolate 1.0 functionality to allow clean separation from a
>>> maintenance perspective, as well as ease to be able to upgrade any piece of
>>> 1.0 functionality independently of other functionality. "
>>>
>>> As I'm waiting for my environment to be commissioned, I've been
>>> fruitlessly scouring the web. It seems like the web has cleansed itself of
>>> most. Net 1.0 info!!
>>>
>>> Has anyone out there faced and defeated (or turned and run away
>>> screaming for their mummy) this type of beast?
>>>
>>> Can you use. Net 1.0 user controls in 3.5?
>>>
>>> Grant
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> regards,
>> Preet, Overlooking the Ocean, Auckland
>>
>
>
>
> --
>
> *Michael Ridland | ThinkSmart Digital*
> Managing Director
> P. 0404 865 350
> E. [email protected]
> W. www.thinksmartdigital.com.au
> T. www.twitter.com/rid00z
> L. au.linkedin.com/in/michaelridland
>
>
>  <http://au.linkedin.com/in/michaelridland>
>
>


-- 
regards,
Preet, Overlooking the Ocean, Auckland

Reply via email to