Everyone knows you always find the answer right after you ask.
I can't believe it took you so long to ask. ;)



On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 9:47 AM, Iain Carlin <[email protected]> wrote:

> Well, as per usual, after weeks of searching, 15 minutes after posting to
> ozDotNet I stumble across the answer:
>
>
> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6948669/iis-7-not-serving-default-document
>
>
>
>
> On 15 November 2012 11:55, Iain Carlin <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Hi Stehen, thanks for the suggestion, but they are not two different
>> pages, that's the problem.
>>
>> For http://mysite the default document is set to index.asp. It should
>> act exactly the same hitting http://mysite or http://mysite/index.aspbut the 
>> first site gives an error.
>>
>>
>> On 15 November 2012 11:29, Stephen Price <[email protected]>wrote:
>>
>>> Perhaps look at whats being loaded to see the difference. Try pressing
>>> F12 in IE for developer tools, click Network and start capturing button.
>>> Load the two pages and see if anything differs majorly between the two
>>> pages?
>>> Should show you any 404s.
>>> Alternatively try the same with Fiddler?
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 8:41 AM, Iain Carlin <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I have an issue with a third-party tool that is deployed as a web site
>>>> on our IIS 7 server.
>>>>
>>>> The site is set up to run under an application pool configured for .Net
>>>> 4.0 in classic mode.
>>>>
>>>> The start page for the site is a classic asp page (not sure why, not my
>>>> site). If I browse to the page directly, (http://mysite/index.asp),
>>>> everything loads and runs fine.
>>>>
>>>> index.asp is configured as the default document for the site. However
>>>> when I browse to http://mysite the asp page loads but all the .Net
>>>> bits are in various states of brokenness.
>>>>
>>>> There are errors in the Windows application log that indicate two
>>>> different frameworks are being loaded - but everything on this site is
>>>> using the single .Net 4.0 application pool.
>>>>
>>>> What is different about loading using the default document vs browsing
>>>> to the file directly?
>>>>
>>>> I wonder if perhaps there is a clash between 64 and 32 bit versions of
>>>> 4.0 somehow.
>>>>
>>>> The vendor is blaming our server, but there are 6 other sites on it,
>>>> also using various combinations of asp and .Net (both V2.0 and 4.0 (64 and
>>>> 32)) and none of those are having any issues.
>>>>
>>>> This has caused me weeks of frustration so any assistance would be
>>>> appreciated.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>

Reply via email to