Yeah; I think Oleg's taking good care of us there. But the question is whether he will make all features of WiX available through his framework, especially if you have seen the proposal for WiX 4.0; it's a lot more involved with support for different deployment technologies like nupkg, appx, and others, so WixSharp could have a lot of catching up to do.
From: ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com [mailto:ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com] On Behalf Of Michael Minutillo Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2013 8:20 PM To: ozDotNet Subject: Re: vs 2010 and 2012 On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 7:38 AM, mike smith <meski...@gmail.com<mailto:meski...@gmail.com>> wrote: wix isn't bad, but why in h*ll did they have to write it in xml? Too lazy to write a text parser, you think? I've just started looking at http://www.csscript.net/wixsharp.html in the hopes that I never have to look at .wxs files ever again.
