I just joined one the other day that when I joined, sent username, pw in clear in the one email. Grrr!
Mike On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 10:50 AM, David Connors <[email protected]> wrote: > How about this? > > > https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=624929134185803&set=o.134450749975832&type=1&theater > > David Connors > [email protected] | M +61 417 189 363 > Download my v-card: https://www.codify.com/cards/davidconnors > Follow me on Twitter: https://www.twitter.com/davidconnors > Connect with me on LinkedIn: http://au.linkedin.com/in/davidjohnconnors > > > On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 6:43 PM, Michael Minutillo < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> If it's a widely adopted logo would you give your username and password >> to a site that didn't comply? >> >> Michael M. Minutillo >> Indiscriminate Information Sponge >> http://codermike.com >> >> >> On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 3:40 PM, David Connors <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 6:25 PM, Michael Minutillo < >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> I really think it'd be interesting for sites to display their password >>>> policy in a multi-part logo like the creative commons one. >>>> >>>> i.e. 512-S-H => 512 bit salted hash >>>> vs 0-P-C => no bits of entropy, Plain, Clear >>>> >>>> It might make them easier to crack by reducing the key-space but >>>> sending my password over SMTP also reduces the key space a fair bit :p >>>> >>> >>> What do you reckon the chances are of people who store passwords in the >>> clear and send them are going to adopt the logo? :) >>> >>> David. >>> >>> >> > -- Meski http://courteous.ly/aAOZcv "Going to Starbucks for coffee is like going to prison for sex. Sure, you'll get it, but it's going to be rough" - Adam Hills
