6/10? I'd love to see the sample set. I suspect if you had truly general sample set it would more likely be that they didn't have a smartphone because:
a. They cost lots b. They don't need them (however true or untrue those ideas may be) On 1 October 2013 15:02, Ian Thomas <[email protected]> wrote: > This may be useful for some people – **** > > “The Office of the Australian Information Commissioner (OACI) has unveiled > a guide designed to help mobile app developers embed better privacy > practices into their products. **** > > The guide, *Mobile privacy: A better practice guide for mobile app > developers*, recommends that developers use short privacy notices rather > than lengthy policies which are hard to read on a small screen.”**** > > <more>**** > > Link<http://www.computerworld.com.au/article/print/527806/oaic_releases_privacy_guide_mobile_app_developers/>to > a Computer World news item > **** > > Link<http://www.oaic.gov.au/privacy/privacy-resources/privacy-guides/guide-for-mobile-app-developers>to > the report / guidelines from OAIC > **** > > ** ** > > Whether the guide itself is just common sense, or has some pearls of > wisdom for us, the issue of privacy for mobile apps is certain to be of > greater concern in future. Even now, the OACI’s survey found that 6 in 10 > Australians chose not to use certain smartphone apps because of concerns > about the way their personal information would be used.**** > > ** ** > ------------------------------ > > **Ian Thomas** > Victoria Park, ****Western Australia******** > -- regards, Preet, Overlooking the Ocean, Auckland
