Not so much in Premier but Adobe After Effects initially... Also if you haven't gone to CC then you should in that case as they've tuned the software much betterer for the RAM renders.
I also do 3D rendering (Cinema4D) and it seems to be more efficient for a portable scenario. I do have a rendering farm at home, so to be fair the more CPU you throw at this whole thing the easier it gets but when i'm on the road i think the MBP is finely tuned for this sort of thing. I've wondered if it has to do with with prescribed hardware in that with Macs typically software vendors know ahead of time what they are dealing with that have very tightly controlled specifics so i've always wondered if they use that to their advantage or simply ignore it? --- Regards, Scott Barnes http://www.riagenic.com On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 9:34 AM, David Connors <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 7:33 PM, Scott Barnes <[email protected]>wrote: > >> I will however say that OSX + Cinema4D is much better to work with in a >> portable situation (again I travel alot for work, so i need to have a >> portable Ux studio ). >> >> Short answer - there is really no + or - in choosing OSX vs Windows >> anymore (except gaming). >> > > Do you render much video in Premier? My main issues are OpenGL > acceleration in Photoshop crapping out (which is largely resolved since I > left nVidia for good and have AMD GPU in my M4600) and also Premier dying > at random points when rendering projects. > > >
